🔗 Share this article

When I am a game master, I traditionally steered clear of heavy use of luck during my D&D sessions. I tended was for narrative flow and session development to be shaped by player choice rather than random chance. Recently, I opted to alter my method, and I'm incredibly glad I did.

The Spark: Observing 'Luck Rolls'

A well-known streamed game showcases a DM who regularly calls for "fate rolls" from the participants. The process entails choosing a polyhedral and defining possible results contingent on the number. This is essentially no distinct from consulting a random table, these get invented spontaneously when a player's action doesn't have a predetermined conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this approach at my own game, mostly because it appeared engaging and provided a break from my normal practice. The results were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated tension between preparation and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional Story Beat

During one session, my party had survived a city-wide fight. Later, a cleric character wondered if two key NPCs—a brother and sister—had survived. In place of choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: on a 1-4, both were killed; a middling roll, only one succumbed; a high roll, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a deeply poignant scene where the characters found the corpses of their allies, still clasped together in their final moments. The cleric performed a ceremony, which was particularly powerful due to prior story developments. As a parting touch, I chose that the forms were suddenly transformed, containing a spell-storing object. By chance, the item's magical effect was exactly what the group lacked to address another major situation. You simply script these kinds of perfect moments.

Honing Your Improvisation

This event led me to ponder if randomization and spontaneity are truly the beating heart of tabletop RPGs. While you are a detail-oriented DM, your improvisation muscles can rust. Adventurers often excel at upending the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a good DM must be able to adapt swiftly and invent scenarios on the fly.

Using on-the-spot randomization is a great way to practice these talents without straying too much outside your usual style. The strategy is to apply them for small-scale decisions that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to determine if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. But, I would consider using it to decide whether the characters reach a location right after a key action occurs.

Strengthening Player Agency

Luck rolls also serves to keep players engaged and create the sensation that the adventure is dynamic, shaping in reaction to their decisions immediately. It combats the sense that they are merely actors in a rigidly planned script, thereby enhancing the collaborative foundation of roleplaying.

This philosophy has long been embedded in the original design. Early editions were enamored with encounter generators, which fit a game focused on treasure hunting. Even though contemporary D&D often prioritizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, this isn't always the best approach.

Finding the Right Balance

Absolutely nothing wrong with doing your prep. However, equally valid no problem with letting go and allowing the whim of chance to guide minor details in place of you. Direction is a major aspect of a DM's role. We use it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, even when doing so might improve the game.

A piece of suggestion is this: Do not fear of temporarily losing your plan. Experiment with a little randomness for inconsequential details. It may find that the unexpected outcome is significantly more rewarding than anything you might have pre-written by yourself.