🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions suggested that switching their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."